Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Fernando Correia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE equivalent to an expired prod tag. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Fernando Correia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability. A very rough translation into English and not worth fixing. DGG ( talk ) 19:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the two references provide no evidence of notability (even after translation). Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.