Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loubo Siois

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Loubo Siois

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ridiculous puff piece on multi-level marketing "brand ambassador". Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - clearly fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 14:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Not notable at all. LlamaDude78 (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to even indicate what this individual is supposedly notable for. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:20, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability provided or readily available. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Strong interest to contribute to wikipedia, especially for the Middle East region. The subject has been noted for entrepreneurship and soon to be nominated in 30 under 30 (30 most powerful individuals below the age of the 30) by Gulf Business magazine, similar to Forbes ranking. I am open for suggestions to rephrase and remove part of the article. Suggest to keep content, as all statements have been referenced and does not contain misleading text. Alternatively, I am willing to temporarily remove through G7 and by few weeks revert back with printed and online publications (including article being currently constructed by BBC journalist) lomberman (talk) 10:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The long list of references the article author has rounded up look impressive at first glance until one actually looks at them and sees that they are either totally unrelated to the article subject or simply mention him in passing. In the absence of any in-depth coverage or reliable sources, it is hard to see how notability has been established here. The inside knowledge of "upcoming articles" indicated by the author in his comments above also raise WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Autobiography concerns. --DAJF (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Strong delete~~ - spectacularly fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 17:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have declined speedy delete G7 by the original author, lomberman, as there are other contributors now - and as lomberman made it clear that the intention is to recreate it shortly, I think we need to let AfD run to completion. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no notability here at all - some of the sources don't even mention him, and those that do are for non-notable things, like junior football, student union, etc. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Happy to reach a conclusion by deleting the article as it is non-notable and focus on more productive articles. lomberman (lomberman) 12:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.