Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mexican presidential firsts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The lone keep did not provide an argument to keep the article. Malinaccier (talk) 14:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mexican presidential firsts

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTRIVIA, Does not meet WP:LISTN, while individual claims can mostly be verified, there don't appear to be any publication dedicated to discussing Mexican presidential firsts as a set, along the same lines as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian prime ministerial firsts, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States vice presidential firsts _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Politics, and Mexico. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. I appear to be this article's only major editor aside from its creator, who doesn’t appear to have edited since 2022. To give this article a chance, I shall do a search myself, to see if sufficient sourcing exists. I doubt it, though. When I am done, I shall either present my case with sources or change to delete. ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per WP:LISTN, this subject does not have enough reliable, independent coverage to warrant an article, thereby leaving the current one in violation of WP:SYNTH. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 02:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no demonstrated claim to notability, and with the inclusion criteria being fuzzy it isn't clear that it could ever be. Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.