Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Catara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Catara

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress. The only viable source for the article is the one cited in the article; GNews pulls up a blog and a litany of name-drops (string: "Lisa Catara"). —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 00:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable performer; no meaningful results from web searches, one weak source in article, from hometown paper ("local up-and-coming in Hollywood"). --Orange Mike | Talk 00:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The was created nearly five years ago so her casreer does not seem to have taken off. If it ever does the article can be recreated. MarnetteD|Talk 04:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a local paper running an article on someone from their readership area trying to make it big in film is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 20:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AFDgoers should be aware that this article was deleted from August 2015 until April 2019, and not assume that all the sources that are out there are already in the article. (Well, you shouldn't do that anyway. But more so than usual here.)
That said, I haven't been able to find anything else. Looking at her IMDB credits, I wouldn't expect to, either: stuntspeople generate orders of magnitude less coverage than equivalently-successful actresses, and her non-stunt credits appear to be limited to single-episode parts, largely uncredited. —Cryptic 20:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did my due diligence before nominating it for deletion - before the article was even undeleted, even. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 21:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't my intention to accuse you of not having done so (I also looked for sources at the time of the original WP:REFUND request), nor anyone else above specifically, and I apologize if I came across that way. —Cryptic 22:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:SALT. There's not enough coverage in the past that shows she's notable in any way. Imbd is not reliable. Absent her dyeing her hair blonde, killing off Melania, and becoming Donald Trump's fourth wife, I don't know how she could become notable - stunt actors have a limited career expectancy. This is a run of the mill stunt/stage actress, whose roles appear mostly to have been red shirts. Bearian (talk) 21:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.