Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kongens gate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is clear. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kongens gate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable street. Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:GEOROAD. Was de-prodded without explanation. Nothing in the article to suggest why this particular street is notable. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 00:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this and similar articles, not remarkable. Geschichte (talk) 21:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unlikely independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 19:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since the article contains nothing about notable buildings or other sites along the street, nor does there appear to be anything on the street's history that would make it notable. Incidentally, when I saw the title I thought it referred to Kongens gate in Oslo, a street which does have a plausible claim to notability. Sjakkalle (Check!) 21:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, no significant coverage online from WP:RS per WP:GEOROAD or WP:GNG. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.