Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirsten Wolcott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 15:26, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kirsten Wolcott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:CRIME, not even close. — raeky t 20:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But isn't it clear that it satisfies GNG? And the coverage seems sustained, which would keep it from falling under NOTNEWS. postdlf (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources:
  - A book published by Pacific Press Publishing Association an Adventist publishing company, she was a student at an Adventist University.
  - A small peice by the local TV station in Chattanooga (the University is basicly in a suburb of Chattanooga).
  - A writeup about the book in a Chattanooga newspaper's website
  - An article in an Adventist magazine
  - Another article in an Adventist magazine
  - An radio interview with the president of the Adventist Guam-Micronesia Mission, only a couple lines
- I don't see how this is significant coverage, which is a part of GNG. If this is all that is needed for inclusion of a murder victim, then be prepared for millions of new pages to be added... I don't see any significant coverage here beyond what you'd expect for any other murder victim. So to include this under GNG and ignore WP:CRIME would open the door to pages for almost anything, and completely negate the purpose of the criteria on WP:CRIME. — raeky t 21:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and the noms subsequent comments. It is a biographical article so it comes WP:BIO, specifically the WP:CRIME section. We should only fall back on to WP:GNG if there is no specific notability guideline for the essence of the article in question. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This seems to have eben a random killing, not a killing becuase she was a missionary; so it ius not a martyrdom. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.