Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Rissling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Rissling

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD, but as I noted then, he fails Fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY Kaiser matias (talk) 23:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not finding evidence of notability. Rlendog (talk) 14:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Ice hockey, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Another of the many hundreds of cases of WP:CREATEDBYDOLOVIS that we're likely going to need to be cleaning up yet another decade from now. Obvious failure of all pertinent notability criteria. Ravenswing 22:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing to justify the presence of this article on Wikipedia. It fails WP:GNG Rodgers V (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete: This fails WP:GNG. Agreed with all editors involved. CastJared (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't find any evidence of notability, thus failing GNG. // 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 09:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.