Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K2 SmartJets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

K2 SmartJets

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has virtually no information in it and no assertion of notability. It was PRODed and then de-PRODed so that's why I'm starting an AfD for this article. Comp dude¹²³ 04:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and as the person who CSDed and PRODded the article, "Thanks Compdude" for saving me the trouble of starting a deletion discussion. My rationale for what I thought would be a pretty straightforward and clear-cut PROD was "Notability has not been established". Mere existence of a company - even an airline (and this isn't an airline, but rather is a small corporate jet air charter firm) - does not automatically confer notability. A google search turns up some pretty pictures; some database entries; some press releases and message board discussions; and the company's own website, but I'm not seeing any significant coverage, thus it doesn't meet the WP:GNG. YSSYguy (talk) 06:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I was surprised that such an article couldn't get speedily deleted. —Comp dude¹²³ 17:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:54, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially zero claim of importance, no evidence of any reliable sources discussing the company. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails notability.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.