Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josie Daga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Josie Daga

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borchure article manifesting as BLP. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND scope_creep^Talk 13:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I guess the web site itself might have a small claim at NCORP. But the coatrack nature of the article, and the fact that there's really not much to say (she founded a web site that sells used wedding dresses) means I do not see great encyclopedic value here.--- Possibly (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a niche retailer without enough coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Delete Another in a long line of pages that needs some care and feeding in order to survive.Miaminsurance (talk) 15:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.