Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Willison (musician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @172 · 03:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- John Willison (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication of notability. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 17:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I put a prod on this, which was removed with the message contest deletion because the person is notable in the edit summary. I placed the PROD originally, as the only reliable reference I could find was the staff listing of the place where he currently works - which I added. All the other hits on a Google search were wiki links. The
creator of the pagethe editor who removed the PROD failed to leave a message on the discussion page explaining why this musician is notable. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 17:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I put a prod on this, which was removed with the message contest deletion because the person is notable in the edit summary. I placed the PROD originally, as the only reliable reference I could find was the staff listing of the place where he currently works - which I added. All the other hits on a Google search were wiki links. The
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 18:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have looked for sources and posted at the classical music project, but nothing has come up yet.Jezhotwells (talk) 18:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, deprodded by a suspected sockpuppeteer. (Suspected by me.) Abductive (reasoning) 20:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I will not bite at the bait which is not helpful in discussions.Mcharg (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per WP:BIO..South Bay (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This article should be kept as a stub. Musician has credits as violinist with the London Philharmonic Orchestra, as well as his own recordings and compositions. I have added a partial discography to the article. He is notable as a world class violinist, and he has also composed and recorded his own works. More research is required to expand this article, but the musician is notable and article should be kept as a stub until it can be expanded. Mcharg (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of notability, Willison is barely mentioned in cited sources. Fails the criteria. --Vejvančický (talk) 05:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. Created by User:Joshuawillison, an editor with little more than this on his contribution plate, and an obvious relative. I haven't investigated notability, but if he does meet that per all of the claims in the article, etc., then a possible keep as stub. Softlavender (talk) 20:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.