Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Taylor (dream worker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Taylor (dream worker)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very weakly referenced, and plenty of WP:peacock. Gaioa (T C L) 15:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychiatry-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 15:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 15:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - he's notable. There are more sources to cite such as this article by Ryan Rominger, Ph.D., PCLC, University of Phoenix, Center for Educational and Instructional Technology Research. The man's work is notable in academia. All one needs is access to academic libraries and not be overly dependent on Google searches. Atsme 💬 📧 18:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is an interesting one. I'm inclined to call it a "notable within a subculture/niche" case and act accordingly, where coverage may be obscure to outsiders. Also, as Atsme says, academia-adjacent people usually have academic rather than news coverage. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 00:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He passes notability test. I found this source by Washington Post, this is an interview with Taylor, this was published in Volume 92 of International Review of Neurobiology, this was published in Volume 35 of Journal of Religion and Health, this book talks about Taylor's work, another academic journal, and there are several other sources that exist like Atsme correctly mentioned. --Ashley yoursmile! 08:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.