Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane.ai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jane.ai

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another unremarkable startup. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Likely covert advertising. MER-C 16:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH as I could find no significant, reliable independent sources, just some social media listings and information on corporate funding. Probably created by an undeclared, conflict-of-interest editor. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - advertising. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 21:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Terrible sourcing. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:NCORP Terrible terrible sourcing. Are they the mickey? scope_creep (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.