Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Stunt (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James stunt)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Petra Ecclestone. Tone 13:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- James stunt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only verifiable assertion of notability is marriage to a notable person. Unless more coverage is found (for example, if he is also notable as a businessman) the article should be deleted or redirected. Peter E. James (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note The 2007 version of this article was deleted after this AfD as a likely hoax. Clearly there have been further developments since which alter the situation. Sparthorse (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the reference included are substantially about Petra Ecclestone who is clearly notable. They are not substantial coverage of Stunt. I can see no evidence he meets Wikipedia's general notability guidelines nor the specific notability guidelines for living people. Marrying someone notable does not in itself make you notable. Nor does having a lot of money and calling yourself a businessman. As a side note, should the article be kept, the original James Stunt should be de-salted and this article moved there. Sparthorse (talk) 21:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note The article has been enhanced since last being checked. there are now pure references to Mr Stunt himself, and also his noteworthy collections of old master paintings, of museum quality, and his unique linear collection of Petrus wine over a century long. Very much part of public interest. Kerkyra22 (talk) 14:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Petra Ecclestone. The sourcing in the article does not establish independent notability for Stunt. -- Whpq (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Petra Ecclestone; Stunt is non-notable except for marrying her; per WP:BLP1E. HurricaneFan25 | talk 16:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.