Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JQuarks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JQuarks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For years, this has only been prodded, deprodded, etc. No expansion. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. I am not seeing anything significant except few passing mentions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 10:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 10:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, which should have been done when it was first created. In my opinion, WP:G4 still applies to a recreation that contains no meaningful independent references when the previous article was deleted for failing notability, even if the text isn't precisely the same. The page as created was also eligible for speedy WP:G12 as a copyvio, so at the very least, the history needs revdeleting. SpinningSpark 12:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 14:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - minor product of minor company with one source (the company). Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.