Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent information society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent information society

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page created for a piece of obscure jargon; it doesn't seem to have much traction outside a few niche reports. toobigtokale (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Technology. toobigtokale (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete To combine appliances, vehicles, and healthcare like this is far too vague. Reywas92^Talk 14:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. toobigtokale (talk) 15:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Tech buzzwords, tech buzzwords, OR, tech buzzwords. Even if this is a distinct concept, I have no idea what it is, based on this article. I can find the term used by a couple of professional organizations and publications: [1], [2]; but it's not clear they're talking about the same thing (and both of those sources appear rather dated). Unless and until someone can put this in plain English this is a case of WP:NEOLOGISM, or close to it.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.