Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I am Zozo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am Zozo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, non-notable stub. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found a trailer review by Dread Central; the movie was mentioned at the website of Screen Daily and Variety [1]. I think it is enough to meet our notability requirements. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 14:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate/userfy. I'm a little hesitant about keeping this based on the sources currently in the article. I've found coverage from 2011, but it's all in relation to the film as far as pre-release stuff goes. I can't find a review of this movie in any reliable sources, which would really make me feel that this pushes it to where it passes WP:NFILM. Heck, if we had just one review I'd be willing to say that it passes notability guidelines. (Maybe someone in charge of the film can send a user copy to Dread Central or one of the various horror movie sites and try to get a quick review?) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Festival screened film whose topic meets WP:NF through coverage of film and production in multiple independent sources, and rather than being from 2011, many of the more recent and speak toward Image Entertainment picking it up for distribution: Cinema Blend Bloody Disgusting JoBlo Dread Central Screen Daily Variety (multiple articles) We can certainly expect this well-covered film topic to have critical commentary and review after wider distribution. This means we can allow a sourcable topic to remain and be further improved over time and through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Coverage can easily be found. Please follow WP:BEFORE from now on. SL93 (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Pre-release coverage does count towards notability. SL93 (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.