Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hospice of Baton Rouge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hospice of Baton Rouge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Considering how long this article has existed (August 2008), there has hardly been any comparable change since then and my searches including local news sources found nothing good aside from business listings at Books. I'm from Texas so I'm not local but I'm simply not seeing any possible improvement. Most of the past editors are no longer active so I'm pinging the only one VMS Mosaic (BTW, why was the first PROD removed? It had been never PRODded before from what I see). SwisterTwister talk 19:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this and other Medicaid providers have gotten some national press recently from new reports related to Planned Parenthood's lawsuit. Bearian (talk) 02:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--I see nothing but the regular directory-style listings for such an organization. Drmies (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I removed the first PROD on 4/9/15. The second one on 4/13. The basis was that it might pass WP:GNG. There is at least one court case in the news, for example. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I cannot find significant coverage of the subject in reliable, independent sources. Jujutacular (talk) 18:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The long list of references in the article are all just links to their own web site. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.