Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hierarchical software models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hierarchical software models

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this as a "one sentence stub definition", which was declined because length is not a reason for deletion. A WP:BEFORE shows little-to-no usage as a term, which fails both WP:GNG and WP:NOT#DICT. DannyS712 (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 00:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and subject does not appear to be notable. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 20:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 14:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the use of the phrase in the literature is inconsistent. It is used in other contexts than just quality attributes. I don't see enough reliable sources referencing the title to justify notability. --mikeu ^talk 23:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.