Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry John Toe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harry John Toe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page seems fishy to me as there are no hits on Transfermarkt and the only thing that has appeared when searching up this name is the Wikipedia article. HawkAussie (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – does not appear to meet WP:N or WP:V. – Levivich 01:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 09:57, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article about semi-pro footballer which doesn't satisfy NFOOTBALL or GNG. Jogurney (talk) 16:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.