Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna Instruments
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hanna Instruments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Running a check on articles with very old notability issues. None of the sources here have any WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NORG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Technology, Italy, United States of America, and Rhode Island. UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Been on the cat:nn list for more than 10 years and never been updated. Refeences are woeful. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH as self-generated news. They are WP:SPS sources. Fails WP:SIRS. Coverage is woeful. This is an old established company and there should be a really decent article on it, but its not this. If there was references available to support they would be there. scope_creepTalk 10:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP criteria apply. I agree with the above, current references fail NCORP and I can't locate anything that might be used. There doesn't appear to be any WP:ATD either. HighKing 20:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - many reliable sources but each is short and usually references one product. None meets our requirement for substantial coverage. This is typical of analysis and test equipment companies -- they have wide fragmented product lines and don't get the coverage more focused companies get. This company is also privately-held which reduces the coverage.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.