Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilherme Arana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guilherme Arana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was that the article Fails both WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY, never played in a fully-professional league. PROD was contested by the article's creator due to the original PROD'er's inappropriate choice of words in their edit summary, but without addressing the underlying concern. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - already explained above. MYS 77 ^✉ 23:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep page - Player won all major titles in the U20 category last year in Brazil, he was part of the main squad for the biggest tournaments at the moment - Campeonato Paulista and Copa Libertadores. He was loaned to a club that plays in the top league as well, expected to debut as soon as the next game or the other one. This user - seems to me a Brazilian supporter of one of those south clubs - just wants to create a messy dispute over the article. It's not as it was created just for the purpose of being the one who created it or anything else. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSPORT explicitly excludes youth football as a source of notablity, and applies only to footballers who have played actual matches. Simply being part of a squad or named to substitutes bench is insufficient for this guideline to apply. Speculation as to future appearances is never grounds for notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 09:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete That they never played in a fully-professional league is a good reason not to have an article. AlbinoFerret

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.