Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grigoriopol transmitter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 10:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grigoriopol transmitter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absence of sufficient citations. Therefore WP:DEL#7. Also possible WP:DEL#8 Nightvour (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 01:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 01:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Maiac: It's best to discuss the contents there. My vote stands. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 22:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think the absence of sufficient citations in this case is more indicative of a lack of effort than a lack of notability. After searching on Google books, I found a few sources talking about the station. It seems to be renowned for its immense range. If anything, Maiac seems to be less notable than the transmitter that lies near it. Mysteryman blue 23:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Changed my vote, per Mysterymanblue. I believe the article needs a little clean-up. Sources can be picked from the search result indicated above. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.