Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greta von Amberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greta von Amberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed fails WP:N.Article also has copyright issues Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing significant or impactful from this character. No journals have used this character at all. No news have covered this character at all. No books have covered this character at all. --George Ho (talk) 00:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment only on copyright issues: the listing has closed, pending evidence of some copyright issues. There's no visible duplication of content and any similarities may easily be the result of two people describing the same series. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 09:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Musicfreak7676 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas. --George Ho (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

I say ditch because there's little-to-no information, unless someone wishes to clean [it] up and make [it] worth keeping.
— _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 17:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.