Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GO-ESSP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mccapra has pointed to various sources which seemingly establish notability. Their comment has not been challenged. (non-admin closure) MrClog (talk) 15:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GO-ESSP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability found. All references are broken and there is no notable trace. AmericanAir88^(talk) 20:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep available sources include this, this, this and this. Mccapra (talk) 21:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.