Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farewell, Moscow Gang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No valid arguments to keep the article. ✗plicit 12:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Farewell, Moscow Gang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Russian film with no real coverage in reliable sources.--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~. Old (1987) film, and eight references have been added. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- There are a lot of links, but almost nothing has to do with the film.--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 19:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok. It’s tedious to check that, but I believe you. I can find no evidence of notability. If evidence for notability lies in Russian sources, I tell the proponents to add these sources to the native language Wikipedia article, which is here. I suspect it could be notable, but at the moment the Russian Wikipedia article is inadequately sourced. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:IAR and WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience is improved by following the destructive Afd and notability guidelines which indicate this and many other informative and factually accurate articles need to be deleted. The guidelines need to be revamped to remove their destructive effects, but in the meantime we must simply ignore them per IAR, a pillar policy. —-В²C ☎ 16:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage to show notability. SL93 (talk) 03:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.