Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exocentric environment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exocentric environment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endocentric environment which was nominated with: "No refs on the page for many years. No finding sources to show that this term meets the notability standards for inclusion". Shreevatsa (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shreevatsa (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or potentially redirect to virtual reality with a topic merge. The majority of scholarly articles that use this terminology set are not independent of its creators (Ivica Bukvic and Disha Sardana, inter alia), but there's a little bit out there that might be usable. I don't think it stands alone as much more than a dictionary definition, but it might warrant a brief mention in the parent topic and, thus, a redirect. Maybe. Lubal (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.