Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternity (1990 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. Geschichte (talk) 09:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eternity (1990 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. Needs two or more sources to pass NFO and NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I did some digging on Newspapers.com and found sourcing. It looks like it got a review from Variety but I can't access it. It also got a review from Film Review, apparently. I did find quite a bit about the production and the impression I'm getting is that there's definitely more out there, just not easily accessible on the internet. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per newly added newspaper.com reviews. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw this nomination per ReaderofthePack’s improvements, consensus and NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.