Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EcoCover
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 10:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- EcoCover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. Has two live sources, one of which it appears to plagarise, the other of which is a corporate press release so not independent. No other independent media coverage. IdiotSavant (talk) 09:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.