Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EclecticIQ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A non notable company allowed to have an article due to technicalities. I guarantee the page views for this article will be very low so YAY. (non-admin closure) JC7V (talk) 23:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EclecticIQ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Passing mentions, routine announcements, PR and blog sources. Maybe a case of too soon. Not seeing WP:SIGCOV or WP:NCORP being met. JC7V (talk) 21:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.