Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXo Platform (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G5: created by a banned or blocked user. Title also salted. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EXo Platform (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficiently notable. References seem to be mentions, press releases, etc and the statement about the United States Joint Forces Command appears to mis-state or overstate what's in the referenced article. This article has been attempted before. At this point, I don't find it's a blatant copyvio as was the case before, but it still seems to be overall promotional. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 02:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There does look to be a general issue with sources - either press releases, promotional or mentions (frequently EXo is grouped with a number of others). Tech24 report - has a report which has to be requested (can't do at current location), but if it has done an indepth consideration of each competitor, then that might be a significant source Nosebagbear (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tried to remove 'promotional' external links and references. I will work to find more neutral. it will be very helpful for me if you mention what reference/link violate the wikipedia policy.

For the article, i reviewed the whole content (comparing to last versions) in order to respect copyright and have a neutral description. it could be very helpful if you specify which part seems to be promotional. For the US Joint forces, it was the first project for eXo platform and i simply point to a third party reference to give more information about the context. Clubiste.Africain1920 (talk) 22:29, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment is there anyone that can help me, please! Clubiste.Africain1920 (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I wouldn't worry regarding promo - it's notability (or lacking it) that would be the cause of people arguing for delete. You need to find some sources that are a) neutral (industry magazines are viewed as on the edge of neutral - newspapers/books/journal articles are best); b) give more than a mention (anything from a decent size paragraph upwards) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.