Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diadibeny Gandega

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 08:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diadibeny Gandega

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is long-term unreferenced, so I tried to find sources to add. I couldn't find sources online to confirm it meets WP:NPLACE/WP:GNG. References in other WP languages are mirror sites, or it came up that the sites were privacy concerns. Boleyn (talk) 21:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Africa. Shellwood (talk) 21:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The source on French Wikipedia shows it exists. The map shows it is clearly a separate settlement. Satisfies WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has a population of over 10,000 people.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly passes WP:GEOLAND and has been WP:HEYed significantly since nomination. SportingFlyer T·C 07:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY but I note that we do not have a citation for "the ordinance of October 20, 1987" which would put this beyond doubt. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to be legally recognized. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.