Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devcoin (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Devcoin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable cryptocurrency. Pretty much all sources are coin news sites and/or mentions. Not much has changed since it was deleted in 2014. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 02:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 11:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Article was created in violation of Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies Bkissin (talk) 17:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Balkywrest (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Balkywrest (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Balkywrest (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, sourcing is just depressing. Likely defunct, just another failed cryptocurrency. Smallbones(smalltalk) 00:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no notability. Balkywrest (talk) 01:39, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Just to go over the sources in the article: most are coin news cites; the Guardian source is a trivial mention, the TechCrunch article doesn't even mention Devcoin, the dot-bit.org source is dead, cryptocur.com appears to be an anonymous blog, the SOTICS paper is a trivial mention, and the remainder are directly from Devcoin itself. Nothing here looks like significant coverage in a reliable source. BenKuykendall (talk) 04:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.