Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Patten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Patten

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Submitting after I declined PROD, since it has already been deleted once. Concern is that this gentleman doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO, with additional concerns of inadequate sourcing. Jclemens (talk) 20:28, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence it meets notability guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Other than the human-interest piece in his town paper from his senior year in high school (cited in the article), I cannot find any coverage of Dave Patten in a reliable source. That article by itself is not enough to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO ("multiple non-trivial published works"). Glenfarclas (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable per WP:MUSICBIO(GregJackP (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Delete non notable musician, no reliable 3rd party sources, none found and the first ref [1] is a pronunciation guide for the name "Dave".—Sandahl (♀) 23:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 01:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.