Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Gauthier
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel Gauthier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject is non-notable and no reliable secondary sources are found. Deadchildstar (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 03:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Deadchildstar (talk) 04:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have made several searches and failed to find any third party coverage at all. For example, a Google news search for "Daniel Gauthier" fonts produced nothing; "Daniel Gauthier" produced 15 hits for other people of the same name but none for the font designer; the first 30 hits from a general Google search produced numerous sites which make his fonts available for download but nothing about Gauthier except the "interview" linked from the article, which is on a site offering his fonts, and cannot be regarded as independent. Other searches produced similar results. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems to be a lack of substantial, non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. He's a working designer, but does not satisfy WP:BIO. freshacconci talktalk 14:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.