Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan le sac and scroobius pip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Rename if nessecary. - Mailer Diablo 13:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dan le sac and scroobius pip

Non-notable group. The talk page even states that it remains to be seen what impact they will have thus violating crystal balling. –– Lid^(Talk) 11:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up and coming artistes I guess... charted at #34 on UK singles chart [1]. Will need to be moved to correct capitalisation, if kept. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-18 11:53Z
'Keep They get played on Radio one. The talk page doesn't have to follow normal Wikipedia rules.GordyB 13:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rename - according to the link given by Resurgent insurgent, they are called Dan le Sac vs. Scroobius Pip
delete per nomOo7565 20:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or move to Thou Shalt Always Kill. —Ashley Y 09:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but the article will need work later:infobox etc & splitting the song stuff into its own article. Emyr42 03:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unless more information can be added. While this group is notable from the relevant hit Thou Shalt Always Kill, there isn't nearly enough info on the group to warrant an article. All that aside, it should be wiki-fied and renamed Dan le Sac vs Scroobius Pip to match their actual name. Watered almonds 06:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Thou Shalt Always Kill. - Tmcgrenery
Rename- The band's title is actually Dan Le Sac vs. Scroobius Pip. Their song has received moderate airplay in Britain, and its video has received hundreds of thousands of views on Youtube. They are a notable band, buyt their page needs to be correctly titled, wikified, and probably should be no longer than a few sentences. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Porvida (talk • contribs) 15:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.