Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dainik Shiksha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 22:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dainik Shiksha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article shows zero evidence of notability. Sayful Ialam (talk) 16:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Sayful Ialam (talk) 16:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Websites, and Bangladesh. Shellwood (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain that why it shows zero evidence of notability please. We also needs reasons for deletion discussion (although my feedback is mutual). Mehedi Abedin 16:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - How is it not notable? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet
- @BangladeshiEditorInSylhet: How is it notable? A pragmatic technique used frequently at articles for creation is WP:THREE. What three sources do you believe best demonstrate notability? --Worldbruce (talk) 13:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non notable online news website. It seems they republish or copy-paste news form other site. In any case, this website fails WP:GNG, WP:NPERIODICAL. The article shows zero evidence of notability. There are some refs on the article but these are just passing mentions. Searches in English and Bengali found no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only information about it in six of the cited sources is "Siddiqur Rahman Khan is the editor of Dainik Shiksha" and minor variations thereon. The other three sources are: self-published, its website, and a press event. There is a total absence of significant coverage. Searches of the usual types didn't find any either. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The cited sources are subpar and only appear to mention this school in a passing. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.