Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSOGaming
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DSOGaming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG / WP:NWEB. Non-notable gaming website, created by a possible WP:COI. (IceWelder, I've went through the proper channels). soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete from the coverage I found in the VG search engine I only seemed to find passing mentions as opposed to the significant coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. Regards Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 16:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not offer significant coverage from reliable third-party sources. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 17:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. It's possible that this site could even become a source itself for VG criticism, but that doesn't mean there's enough independent coverage to explain what this source is. No prejudice against re-creating it once reliable sources are found, as always. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.