Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOORS eXtension Language (DXL)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 12:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DOORS eXtension Language (DXL) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. No significant coverage from independent reliable sources. The sources cited in the article are all primary sources (IBM and Sodius company websites) and unreliable sources (Stack Overflow, which is a self-published source). Sources outside of the article are no better. — Newslinger talk 06:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep (or else merge to Rational DOORS). There is independent RS mentioning this, see: Roel Wieringa; Anne Persson (16 June 2010). Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality: 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010, Essen, Germany, June 30-July 2, 2010. Proceedings. Springer. p. 176. ISBN 978-3-642-14192-8.; Chris Dale; Tom Anderson (13 January 2009). Safety-Critical Systems: Problems, Process and Practice: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Safety-Critical Systems Symposium Brighton, UK, 3 - 5 February 2009. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-84882-349-5.; Paul Grünbacher; Anna Perini (20 February 2017). Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality: 23rd International Working Conference, REFSQ 2017, Essen, Germany, February 27 – March 2, 2017, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing. p. 16. ISBN 978-3-319-54045-0.; Farhad Arbab; Marjan Sirjani (4 October 2007). International Symposium on Fundamentals of Software Engineering: International Symposium, FSEN 2007, Tehran, Iran, April 17-19, 2007, Proceedings. Springer. p. 140. ISBN 978-3-540-75698-9.; Bruno Schienmann (2002). Kontinuierliches Anforderungsmanagement: Prozesse - Techniken - Werkzeuge (in German). Pearson Deutschland GmbH. p. 285. ISBN 978-3-8273-1787-2. SJK (talk) 10:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- See also Ni, D. C., Martinez, J., Eccles, J., Thomas, D., & Lai, P. K. M. (1994, December). Process automation with enumeration and traceability tools. In Industrial Technology, 1994., Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on (pp. 361-365). IEEE. Merten, T., Schäfer, T., & Bürsner, S. (2012, September). Using RE knowledge to assist automatically during requirement specification. In Requirements Engineering Education and Training (REET), 2012 IEEE 7th International Workshop on (pp. 9-13). IEEE. Chicago. Rahman, A., & Amyot, D. (2014, August). A DSL for importing models in a requirements management system. In Model-Driven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE), 2014 IEEE 4th International (pp. 37-46). IEEE. Chicago. SJK (talk) 10:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing the Dale/Anderson book. However, I don't think the rest of the books provide significant coverage of DXL. I also don't have access to the IEEE publications. If you can show that an IEEE publication (or another source) provides significant coverage of DXL, and not just as a passing mention while discussing DOORS, then I'll withdraw the nomination. — Newslinger talk 11:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Newslinger: So, of the IEEE sources, the first two just mention it as an example of a requirements management system (RMS) extension language. (Although, the fact that whenever an example of such a language needs to be mentioned in the literature, almost invariably DXL, and DXL alone, is mentioned, may not be SIGCOV, but it is clear evidence of notability.) However, if you read the paper "A DSL for importing models in a requirements management system"–the topic of the paper is developing a DSL for requirements engineering which in principle could be used with any RMS. But, to practically demonstrate it, they choose to implement it with a single RMS, which is Rational DOORS. And in their actual implementation, the DSL is translated to DXL. So, rather than DXL being something they briefly mention, they mention it again and again and again, because it played a key part in the research which their paper describes. SJK (talk) 12:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Your description of the Rahman/Amyot paper looks good enough to me. I'll add these two sources into the article. Thanks again for your research. — Newslinger talk 12:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Newslinger: So, of the IEEE sources, the first two just mention it as an example of a requirements management system (RMS) extension language. (Although, the fact that whenever an example of such a language needs to be mentioned in the literature, almost invariably DXL, and DXL alone, is mentioned, may not be SIGCOV, but it is clear evidence of notability.) However, if you read the paper "A DSL for importing models in a requirements management system"–the topic of the paper is developing a DSL for requirements engineering which in principle could be used with any RMS. But, to practically demonstrate it, they choose to implement it with a single RMS, which is Rational DOORS. And in their actual implementation, the DSL is translated to DXL. So, rather than DXL being something they briefly mention, they mention it again and again and again, because it played a key part in the research which their paper describes. SJK (talk) 12:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing the Dale/Anderson book. However, I don't think the rest of the books provide significant coverage of DXL. I also don't have access to the IEEE publications. If you can show that an IEEE publication (or another source) provides significant coverage of DXL, and not just as a passing mention while discussing DOORS, then I'll withdraw the nomination. — Newslinger talk 11:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- See also Ni, D. C., Martinez, J., Eccles, J., Thomas, D., & Lai, P. K. M. (1994, December). Process automation with enumeration and traceability tools. In Industrial Technology, 1994., Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on (pp. 361-365). IEEE. Merten, T., Schäfer, T., & Bürsner, S. (2012, September). Using RE knowledge to assist automatically during requirement specification. In Requirements Engineering Education and Training (REET), 2012 IEEE 7th International Workshop on (pp. 9-13). IEEE. Chicago. Rahman, A., & Amyot, D. (2014, August). A DSL for importing models in a requirements management system. In Model-Driven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE), 2014 IEEE 4th International (pp. 37-46). IEEE. Chicago. SJK (talk) 10:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.