Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Ruppert
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DJ Ruppert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable dj, all the sources are paid for and there's nothing better in a search. Ranking anywhere on Beatport doesn't contribute to WP:N and to my surprise, readersdigest.co.uk is not Readers Digest CUPIDICAE💕 16:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - sources appear to be PR/churnalism. Beatport rankings are not enough to meet WP:NMUSIC.-KH-1 (talk) 08:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete not even close to being a notable DJ.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Automatic red flag for me if Vents is used as a reference; it's the ultimate in churnalism. (The other sources do not establish notability - she doesn't meet GNG.) JSFarman (talk) 17:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.