Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corellium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corellium

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability for this company. It has made a few headlines for all the wrong reasons and seems to be at legal war with Apple. Despite this, none of the refs really talk about the company, just the legal fight. The only other ref is a review of the software, not the company. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. As nom points out, this company seems mainly famous for being sued by Apple. Two or three of the sources are primary & worthless. Article creator is now blocked -- not for promotion or for COI but for running multiple accounts. --Lockley (talk) 22:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.