Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clio (Hendrik Goltzius)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was hey hey hey Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clio (Hendrik Goltzius)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article as nominated did not demonstrate a pass of GNG, but that's very different from the subject passing GNG, which is true when adequate sources exist regardless of whether they have been added already; nominator seems to have failed to follow WP:BEFORE. I expanded the article and added sources showing that it is held in the collections of some world-renowned museums and that it has inspired other notable works. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with thanks to David Eppstein for improving the article.Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What happened to WP:BEFORE? E Eng 06:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I fail to see how this doesn't meet the GNG. To quote David Eppstein, it is held in the collections of some world-renowned museums and has inspired other notable works. Eman 235/talk 12:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone snow-close this? There are so many better things people could be wasting their time on. E Eng 21:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is going to help my AfD percentage! Chris Troutman (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, just piling on. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^[FBDB] Always good to know you're there when the chips are down. :P E Eng 23:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.