Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical Device Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 08:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical Device Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

highly promotional article lacks any independent sources DocumentError (talk) 03:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the company's LinkedIn is the top search result. this is the only thing even semi-usable that I found. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 19:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nominators rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is nothing in the public domain except mentions in press releases about parent company mergers and acquisitions.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.