Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClickUp
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- ClickUp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This semipromotional article is sourced entirely to reposted press releases and the sort of blogs that host mostly paid advertisements as 'articles'. I've looked and I haven't sound any better sources, so I think this article does not meet the general notability guideline or WP:NSOFTWARE and should be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 14:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Article is corp and product spam (I removed the "Features" section). -- HighKing 16:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: ClickUp has been mentioned and sourced by larger publications as well. These are not paid promotions, and I've listed some of these below. The company just signed on SpaceX for their beta trial which will be released publicly in the summer. I do not believe there is reason to remove this listing. Wes415 12:48, 7 May 2017 (PST)
- https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/clickup/funding-rounds
- http://www.thedigitalprojectmanager.com/best-project-management-software-tools/
- https://www.inc.com/drew-hendricks/7-tools-that-startups-should-know-about-right-now.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wes415 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Crunchbase is an indiscriminate database of all companies. thedigitalprojectmanager is a another blog with no reputation for a reliable editorial process. Inc.com would be better, but this is posted in the bloggy/opinion contributors section. As the article is tagged 'The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.' - MrOllie (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I agree. None of those references meet the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing 16:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.