Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClickTime.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ClickTime.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable piece of timesheet software. The article is written like an advertisement (per the 3-year old tag), a search for sources returns very little, and the sources present in the article are either non-independent or mere passing soundbites. The article seems to have been created by a single purpose account too. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - references are highly padded with articles that don't mention the company or do so only in passing, not to mention a directory listing. I can't find anything that suggests notability. But promotional content is easy to find - the whole thing. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not coming up with any in-depth coverage in independent sources, either. This does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:COMPANY. gongshow talk 09:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Many of the sources in the article are about insignificant stuff, or they're just passing mentions. No indication of notability established. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with the points made above. Bluebonnet07 (talk) 15:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH and potential WP:BOMBARDMENT.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.