Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civil Designer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv🍁 06:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Civil Designer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

REFUNDed PROD. Original reason for deletion was "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement." and the article has not been improved since it was recreated. It is still referenced, and fails to offer any claims on why it it is notable. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (nn; found no SIGCOV). - Flori4nKT A L K 16:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seriously lacks notability. If there was a way to improve it, it probably would have happened after the refund.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamant (talk • contribs) 107:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Refunded at [1] as possible merge with Allycad at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllyCAD though given what came back I'd wished I'd refunded to draft. South African developed Autodesk competitor and South Africa appears to have been primary market. I would have said AllyCAD was the more notable due to the educational training use, or claimed use, and I added a source to that article about it which was binned. Believe this was used in several major projects, but, most references are primary claims by software producer, who now also stewards AllyCad probably from the Lawless. There is probably an article here, but the main zone is South Africa and the company behind the product have mostly press releases left online; Anything better has probably WP:LINKROTted. I dispute the snide original unsigned comment If there was a way to improve it, it probably would have happened after the refund as per the diff the hope was more for a merge to AllyCAD; and I have quite other RL and WP articles to go round. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.