Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck murphy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chuck murphy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Seems non-notable, as far as I'm concerned. 75% of the links are red. 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 19:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No proof of notability. Nick Graves (talk) 19:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The way I see it: The guy is a non-notable person who is the creator of two non-notable websites/companies. — Parent5446 (t n c k e l) 19:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't know if the company might be notable -- I tend to doubt it -- but an article about an individual that doesn't have any personal information about that individual doesn't meet WP:RS or WP:N. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Chuck is non-notable.
Redirect to Charlie Murphy.Nick Graves (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Is Charlie Murphy actually known as Chuck, or is that just an assumption? --Dhartung | Talk 21:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just being goofy. Nick Graves (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Smartwebs is marginally notable and Murphy could be covered in a future article on his start-up, but he isn't individually notable. Also, Geogre's Law applies. --Dhartung | Talk 21:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no notability, probably could have non-controversially speedy deleted. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Red links aren't a deletion reason. (No opinion on the notability). --Fabrictramp (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Well, if most of the projects this guy's been involved with are red links, that does seem to support the presumption that he is non-notable. Nick Graves (talk) 03:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.