Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chittagong City Center
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chittagong City Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Proposed since 2012. Nothing updated, no reliable sources found. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of notability. The Other language article suggest it has been built, but all the references there indicate it is still proposed and they do not support WP:GNG. Jeepday (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Both reference are reliable. Should have add more two reference just like bengali Wikipedia. — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 08:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I don't trust either reference, and the other references on Bengali Wiki look like forum posts. I'm not convinced this building was ever truly in development; the project must be assumed to be dead now. An IP changed the projected creation date with no sourcing. The image is from https://www.stylelivingbd.com/office/ - possibly a copyvio and that page suggests it could just be spec work from a design firm. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per User:力, also there is no WP:SIGCOV. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.