Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardumen Capital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cardumen Capital

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCORP. 1292simon (talk) 23:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. There is some sourcing ([1], [2], [3]) but (1) I am not familiar with these papers and (2) even if they are reputable, the coverage seems fairly routine and is not a clear pass of WP:ORGIND. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted after a contested "delete" closure per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 November 25.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Came here from the DRV close. Fails WP:NORG - there are a few sources and interviews in startup and business magazines, but I don't see anything here which clearly passes WP:SIRS. SportingFlyer T·C 10:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added new sources from notable newspapers that meet Wikipedia criteria. Hope we can have it back, the israeli tech funding ecosystem is huge and underrepresented in Wikipedia. Regards. Alerogue 11:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing 12:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~strike double !vote Most of the sources include significant coverage about the company and not just a trivial mention. As regards reliability, more than three sources come from Spanish and Israeli well known newspapers and respected mainstream publications like business magazines. It is worth to mention that the reputation of the source does help to determine whether the source is reliable and independent. Likewise, none of the sources belong to someone affiliated with the company listed and none of them are advertising, press releases or autobiographies. Moreover, I have provided several significant independent sources for demonstrating the notability of the organization. Hope we can have it back, the israeli tech funding ecosystem is huge and underrepresented in Wikipedia. Regards. Alerogue 11:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more round.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG Kolma8 (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - Like AleatoryPonderings, I found coverage, but not enough to satisfy either WP:SIGCOV or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.