Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarSwap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CarSwap

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. US-Verified (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The SmartCompany and Business News Australia articles cited provide pretty good support for Wikipedia:INDEPTH and I think I see enough longitudinal coverage to satisfy Wikipedia:GNG without even doing my own search. I therefore lean preserve. Jo7hs2 (talk) 03:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jo7hs2, I checked. The SmartCompany is okay (editorial team exists) but still feels like promotional. Business News Australia has no editorial team, so we trust this source. To meet WP:NCORP, we need at least three in-depth sources. The SmartCompany is one (I count it), where are other two? Also, this article was created by a spammer, so we can't trust them. US-Verified (talk) 09:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, Software, and Australia. AllyD (talk) 05:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promotional article with sources appearing to be promotional in nature. - GMH Melbourne (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Too promotional need a wholesale rewrite and more reliable sources. Furthermore it was created by a user blocked for advertising. Lightoil (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional article.--Bexaendos (talk) 09:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.