Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian EMR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian EMR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable website. No Google News results, and the only Books results are for the phrase "Canadian EMR" generically, almost entirely in non-healthcare contexts. The site has apparently won an award, but I don't believe it meets the NWEB criteria for a "well known" award. —Darkwind (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find significant coverage about this web site. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 13:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.